Government land-bank of Berkeley v. Warner, 292 U.S. 53 (1934). Federal Land-bank of Berkeley v. Warner
U.S. Great The Courtroom
1. an agreement in a grazing money finance that, just in case of meet to foreclose, the mortgagor shall pay out a reasonable attorney’s costs to be set by your trial, was appropriate beneath national grazing funding Act if valid under the state law. P. 292 U. S. 54 .
2. the intention of the ranch money operate should equip farmers, by mortgaging their particular lands, to have personal loans at bargain, and this purpose is intended to be noticed in deciding what exactly is an inexpensive attorney’s charge in a foreclosure proceeding. P. 292 U. S. 57 .
Certiorari, 290 U.S. 620, to analyze the affirmance of a decree foreclosing a farm loan finance when the test judge got refused to cause a stipulation for an attorney at law’s price.
U.S. Supreme Trial
National Land Bank of Berkeley v. Warner
CERTIORARI TOWARD THE GREAT LEGAL OF ILLINOIS
1. a stipulation in a Farm financing home loan that, just in case of match to foreclose, the mortgagor shall shell out an inexpensive attorneys’s costs staying corrected from legal, are legitimate beneath government grazing debt Act if good in the state law. P. 292 U. S. 54 .
2. The purpose of the grazing funding operate is always to permit growers, by mortgaging his or her lands, to have money at cheap, which mission is intended to be seen in deciding just what is a sensible lawyers’s charge in a property foreclosure proceeding. P. 292 U. S. 57 .
Certiorari, 290 U.S. 620, to analyze the affirmance of a decree foreclosing a grazing financing mortgage loan wherein the tryout legal had refused to enforce a stipulation for legal counsel’s costs.
MR. JUSTICE BUTLER provided the opinion from the courtroom. (more…)